Please note that articles may contain affilitate links. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Wednesday, 17 December 2025

Curtis Arnold: The Seedy Past of a Social Media Deviant

The Manchester Evening News has finally confirmed that self-proclaimed citizen journalist Curtis Arnold (otherwise known as Daniel J. Edwards and DJE Media) is a convicted sex offender.

The MEN's front page from today, 17th December 2025, is shown above. You can read the full text from an archived copy here.

Arnold, you might remember, is the social media fiend who filmed the lifeless body of missing woman Nicola Bulley being recovered from the River Wyre on 19th February 2023. I have previously written about his antics here and here. In short, he is a habitual liar with many previous convictions for offences of dishonesty.

He obtained his macabre footage by lying his way past police officers with his camera. He uploaded the footage to YouTube for notoriety and clicks, later boasting that he'd made around £900 from it.

In a documentary about Nicola's disappearance her partner, Paul Ansell, recounted how Arnold had turned up at their childrens' school in the hope of getting some shots of him during the school run. 

The sex offender label arises from offences Arnold was convicted of at the start of 2019, when he was 30-years-old:

  • 12 counts of fraud by false representation;
  • 1 count of voyeurism;
  • 1 count of causing a person to engage in sexual activity without consent;
  • 1 count of making indecent images of a child.

He was sentenced for these offences by HHJ Rosa Dean at Harrow Crown Court on 8th February 2019 (see transcript). The sentence was subsequently varied on 4th March 2019 (see transcript). The transcripts were obtained by YouTuber Street Video Reviewer. Full credit to him for doing the leg work on this. Prior to publishing its piece, the Manchester Evening News has verified the details in the transcripts - not that there was ever any doubt in my mind (despite liar Arnold's repeated denials).

Briefly, Arnold duped more than a dozen young women into modelling gymwear. He provided them with rather skimpy leggings, some of which had been modified to reveal their pubic regions, and promised them money and fame in return for sexualised poses.

Of course the money and fame never came, with Arnold instead using the images for his own sordid little purposes. One of the girls was only 17-years-old at the time, which accounts for the indecent images conviction.

HHJ Dean, sentencing, said: "SE, as you well knew, was underage. You well knew because you had been part of her induction to the gym. She was 17-years-old when you took photographs of her.

"She described being led to a private training area at the back of the gym, asked to try on different pairs of leggings, asked to walk on a treadmill so that photographs could be taken from behind. Asked to do squats and a downward dog pose with her bottom in the air. Asked to straddle a chair, and at one point asked to change into a pair of leggings where the front was so low that it would show her underwear. So a very unfortunately and unsavoury incident."

It is also to be noted that Arnold, as a known wrong 'un, was already banned from some of the gyms where he perpetrated the frauds.

Arnold was sentenced to 34 months' imprisonment and made subject to a 10-year Sexual Harm Prevention Order (SHPO). That order, which he has vehemently denied having, remains in force until 2029.

I'm sure this will get further traction in the national media in the coming days, so stay tuned.

I should also add that the only reason I am writing about this now is because of Arnold's bare-faced lies about this matter being totally obliterated by the Manchester Evening News.

If you look at the mock-up newspaper front page in this earlier article you'll find a special Easter Egg relating to Arnold. Well done to the two people who told me they'd found it!

Thursday, 11 December 2025

Hampshire Shop Thief Banned from Wearing Wigs

A Hampshire shop thief has been banned from wearing wigs in an effort to curb her prolific offending.

Rachael Cole, 44, of Warren Close, Whitehill, admitted four offences of shop theft when she appeared at Basingstoke Magistrates' Court on Friday, 5th December 2025.

The offences placed her in breach of a 20-week suspended sentence imposed by Portsmouth Magistrates' Court on Friday, 25th July 2025.

Magistrates heard that the 44-year-old stole £964 worth of goods from shops in Hook and Liphook between 10th November and 1st December 2025.

In one particularly brazen heist, Cole donned a wig to disguise herself before making off with seven bags of dog food from Sainsbury's, Liphook.

Magistrates were of the view that Cole's offences were so serious that only a custodial sentence was appropriate.

She was sentenced to 36 weeks' custody, which included activation of the earlier suspended sentence order.

The court also made her subject to a Criminal Behaviour Order, which for the next two years bans her from every Sainsbury's and Tesco store in the UK. The order also prohibits her from wearing any wig, hairpiece or face covering to conceal her appearance when entering or inside any retail premises.

Inspector Matt Wake, of Hampshire and Isle of Wight Constabulary, said: "Cole repeatedly and brazenly steals from local businesses, even going as far as making a poor attempt at disguising herself with a wig to try and deceive police and shop owners.

"Once she's served her prison sentence, she will face a number of very strict conditions that prohibit her behaviour. If she fails to comply, she will be arrested and brought before the courts once more."

Tuesday, 9 December 2025

Man Fined for Dorset Harbour Showboating

A man has been fined for exceeding the speed limit in Poole Harbour on a jet ski.

Joshua Selby, of an unknown age and address, admitted an offence of recklessly exceeding the Poole Harbour speed limit on a personal watercraft when he appeared at Poole Magistrates' Court on Wednesday, 26th November 2025.

This is an offence contrary to Poole Harbour byelaws 2(a) and 2(aa), which has a maximum sentence on summary conviction of a fine at level 3 (£1,000).

Magistrates heard that the offence took place on the afternoon of Sunday, 29th June 2025.

Selby was fined £666 and ordered to pay £1,000 prosecution costs and £266.

Harbour Master Harry Gregory said: "Poole Harbour Commissioners will continue to educate users of their duty of care and raise awareness of the byelaws put in place to protect harbour users, wildlife and property.

"We hope this latest prosecution will serve as a further warning to others. The rules are in place to protect lives and ensure everyone can enjoy their time on the water safely and responsibly.

"If you break the rules, we will act and undertake an average of three to four prosecutions per season."

Friday, 5 December 2025

"Horny and Homeless": Amorous Chester Couple Outraged Public Decency

An amorous Chester couple have been convicted of outraging public decency after engaging in a spot of early morning coitus in the city centre.

Fraser Connelly, 39, and Sophie Lennon, 36, both of no fixed abode, each admitted an offence of outraging public decency when they appeared at Chester Magistrates' Court on Friday, 5th December 2025.

Outraging public decency is an offence at common law. It is triable either way and has a maximum sentence of 12 months' custody and/or a fine at level 5 (unlimited) on summary conviction; an unlimited (theoretically) period in custody and/or an fine at level 5 (unlimited) on conviction on indictment.

Magistrates heard that the offence took place during the early hours of Saturday, 11th November 2025. CCTV operators observed the couple in action for 20 minutes, presumably just to be sure of what they were up to.

Marta Pawlowska, prosecuting, told the court that the couple were on The Rows, close to Rosie's nightclub, which had closed only a short time earlier. There was therefore some concern that early morning revellers might have copped an eyeful.

The court heard that Connelly made significant comment on his arrest, along the lines of: "Arrested for shagging? I'm horny and homeless. What can I say? I'm sorry."

Both defendants were subject to a community order at the time of the offence.

Richard Thomas, mitigating for Lennon, said that his client was "very embarrassed" at having to appear in court. She had not been interviewed, as the CCTV footage was "sufficient evidence".

Richard Sibbeon, mitigating for Connelly, said his client was "embarrassed and ashamed" at what had happened.

Mr Sibbeon added that the couple had been "overtaken by romantic feeling" and found a "relatively secluded" spot.

Magistrates fined each defendant £50 and ordered them to pay £85 towards prosecution costs and £20 surcharge.

In a similar situation I think I might have been inclined to keep them in for the day, instead of depleting their already very limited means.

Creating articles can be thirsty work:
If you have found this article entertaining or informative then you can show your appreciation by buying a coffee.